Hotel California

The Mayor of Los Angeles announced today that he wants to build 20,000 units of affordable housing in that city over the next five years. The cost will be high, somewhere near Five billion dollars. He hopes to raise the money from the Federal government (a hard task considering the state of things), charities, and philanthropists. He recognizes it will be a hard road, but he also realizes that something needs to be done.

LA is one of the cities with the highest rent costs in the nation. It has 44,000 homeless people–the largest population of homeless in the nation. Some of the new housing units would be devoted to the homeless in an attempt to deal with the problem of people on the streets. High housing (renting and buying) prices keep people from moving to Los Angeles and cause people who work there to have to commute long distances from the cheaper suburbs.

I think this is a great idea. There should be more government involvement in providing affordable housing for people with lower incomes–or anyone for that matter. The structure don’t have to be glamorous, only functional. It will be a difficult process, especially if the financial situation continues to worsen, but it is a noble and worthwhile effort to undertake. It’s nice to see any city take the initiative and propose something like this. Now all we can do is sit back, offer support in any way we can, and hope that it works out. Chances are it will not–there is always something to kill a great idea–but we have to hope. Sometimes it feels like that’s all we have left.


One comment on “Hotel California

  1. Dusty says:

    In California, having adequate affordable housing is state law. Every city and county has placed upon it by the state dept. of housing and community development a quota for various housing types (very low income, low income, moderate income, etc.) where the median income in the county is the baseline for the assessment. And the housing doesn’t have to be public. Actually, it is usually built by developers of residential projects who is required to construct a certain number of low income units (to maintain a certain ratio). One problem comes where developers are allowed to pay “in-lieu fees” instead of actually building the affordable housing. Now state law says that this money can only be allocated for affordable housing, and must be timely, but sometimes is isn’t. Sometimes the units are just never built, or they are not built in the places where they are needed. But there is a program, and some local agencies actually make it work. Just like everything else between the state and local gov’ts, the state uses funding for leverage: “If you include the housing quotas in your general plan housing element, then you’ll get some money to build roads and shits.” To my knowledge the state has never taken punitive action in a situation where a local agency has just flat denied to consider affordable housing. Tisk tisk.

    Anyways…Socialism up, hos down.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s